Jump to main content

Publication : Global Perspectives or the Right to have Rights

The Idea of “Global Social Rights” (GSR). Brigitte Oehrlein, Policy Paper 2/2010

Key facts

Series
Policy Papers
Published
May 2010
Ordering advice
Only available online

Details

The concept of GSR intends to give an idea of the conditions needed for everyone to lead a life in dignity. Inherent to this is the “right to have rights” (Hannah Arendt). Yet capitalism is characteristically profit-oriented, and therefore incorporates rivalry, competition and commodification. This precludes the aim of a life in solidarity and justice, which every individual should be entitled to in order to enable them to want to, and to be able to contribute to society with their own personal abilities. What conditions does capitalism impose on people by way of the sociability that it has created, and what would be the structure of a sociability that takes unconditional GSR as its starting point instead of, as does capitalism, goods for money or service for return or calculating input and output?

The concept of GSR seeks to offer a perspective that enables the  long-maintained crisis of a capitalist society of paid labour to be transformed into a society which replaces the principles of capital usability with the aim of achieving the greatest possible satisfaction for the individual. This must go beyond defending the Keynesian welfare state – and in the end the state itself. Based on the Fordist model of accumulation, the welfare state was linked to the mass production of consumer goods, enabling full employment for a limited period of time. From a left point of view, taking leave of a nation state based on paid labour would not be regrettable for a number of reasons: the nation state was

  1. an authoritarian state based on forms of bureaucratic control, such as the exclusion of non-usable parts of society;
  2. patriarchal, as it was bound up with so-called “normal working conditions”, male sole breadwinner with bourgeois nuclear family structures
  3. thus dependent on the sexual division of labour; linked to many women being reduced to unpaid reproductive work;
  4. built on the exploitation and exclusion of the global South and in disregard of the conditions needed for a healthy environment, due to the societies of the north.

More in PDF.

More on this theme

From the Green Deal to a War Deal?

: Analysis 02.12.2025

The West used to promote a corporate-led energy transition, but has now pivoted to military spending

UN Treaty: Corporate Lobbying vs. Global Justice

: Online Publication 11/2025

The UN negotiations on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to…

Star Wars in the Sahel

: Analysis 06.11.2025

How Elon Musk is quietly rewiring Africa’s digital frontier